Skip to content

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is the lower-priced of the two on Router One — about 50% less on a 1M-input + 1M-output mix. Both carry a 1.05M context window. Both answer on /v1/chat/completions and /v1/messages (Claude Code).

Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Opus 5.5 compared on current per-token rates, context window, and capabilities — both callable through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint that logs each request it forwards.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5: rates, context window, and capabilities

SpecClaude Fable 5.2Claude Opus 5.5
Input / 1M tokens$4.80$2.40
Output / 1M tokens$24.00$12.00
Cached input / 1M tokens$0.12$0.40
Context window1.05M1.05M
CapabilitiesChat, Streaming, Tool calling, VisionChat, Streaming, Tool calling, Vision
Subscription plansNot in any plan — walletNot in any plan — wallet
Detail pageClaude Fable 5.2Claude Opus 5.5

What does 1M tokens cost on Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5?

For a workload of 1M input plus 1M output tokens at current rates: Claude Fable 5.2 comes to $28.80, Claude Opus 5.5 comes to $14.40 — Claude Opus 5.5 is about 50% cheaper on this mix. Real workloads skew heavily toward input tokens, so weigh the input rate by your own ratio; the cached-input row above is the posted catalog rate for that model.

Switch between Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Opus 5.5

The API key, base URL and endpoints stay the same: Router One serves both on /v1/messages and /v1/chat/completions, not on /v1/responses, so Claude Code (/v1/messages) runs either model and Codex CLI (/v1/responses) runs neither. Claude Opus 5.5 code may still need changes before it runs on Claude Fable 5.2. Per Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.2 migration guide (checked 2026-11-11), both models always think adaptively on Anthropic's own API, and the changes it lists include these: Claude Fable 5.2's default effort is high where Claude Opus 5.5's is medium, so a request that omits effort runs one level higher; Claude Fable 5.2 enforces the prefix check for every account, so code that edits the system prompt, tools or earlier messages and then sends back a Claude Fable 5.2 thinking block gets a 400 error; and Claude Opus 5.5 cannot read Claude Fable 5.2's thinking blocks, so a conversation moved from Claude Fable 5.2 to Claude Opus 5.5 continues without that reasoning. Anthropic's models overview (checked 2026-11-11) suggests starting with Claude Opus 5.5 for most workloads and using Claude Fable 5.2 for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, or when evals on Claude Opus 5.5 at higher effort still fall short. On a Pro, Max or Ultra plan the billing does not change: as of the 2026-11-11 plan response, neither Claude Fable 5.2 nor Claude Opus 5.5 is in a plan tier, so both bill the wallet per token.

compare.sh
curl https://api.router.one/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-your-router-one-key" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model": "anthropic/claude-fable-5.2", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]}'

# Same request, other model — change one string:
#   "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5.2 cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5?

Input: Claude Fable 5.2 $4.80 vs Claude Opus 5.5 $2.40 / 1M tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 has the lower rate. Output: Claude Fable 5.2 $24.00 vs Claude Opus 5.5 $12.00 / 1M tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 has the lower rate. Total cost depends on the workload's input, output and cache usage. Rates change; the /models page is the live source of truth.

Is Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Opus 5.5 included in a Router One subscription?

Neither Claude Fable 5.2 nor Claude Opus 5.5 is in a Router One plan, so every call to either bills the wallet per token.

Can I switch between Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Opus 5.5 without changing code?

The API key, base URL and endpoints stay the same: Router One serves both on /v1/messages and /v1/chat/completions, not on /v1/responses, so Claude Code (/v1/messages) runs either model and Codex CLI (/v1/responses) runs neither. Claude Opus 5.5 code may still need changes before it runs on Claude Fable 5.2. Per Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.2 migration guide (checked 2026-11-11), both models always think adaptively on Anthropic's own API, and the changes it lists include these: Claude Fable 5.2's default effort is high where Claude Opus 5.5's is medium, so a request that omits effort runs one level higher; Claude Fable 5.2 enforces the prefix check for every account, so code that edits the system prompt, tools or earlier messages and then sends back a Claude Fable 5.2 thinking block gets a 400 error; and Claude Opus 5.5 cannot read Claude Fable 5.2's thinking blocks, so a conversation moved from Claude Fable 5.2 to Claude Opus 5.5 continues without that reasoning. Anthropic's models overview (checked 2026-11-11) suggests starting with Claude Opus 5.5 for most workloads and using Claude Fable 5.2 for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, or when evals on Claude Opus 5.5 at higher effort still fall short. On a Pro, Max or Ultra plan the billing does not change: as of the 2026-11-11 plan response, neither Claude Fable 5.2 nor Claude Opus 5.5 is in a plan tier, so both bill the wallet per token.

Where do these numbers come from?

Specs and prices on this page render from the live Router One catalog — the same data as the /models page — and refresh with it. Pricing methodology is documented on /pricing-methodology. Rates on this page were read from the live catalog on 2026-11-12 (UTC) and refresh within the hour.

More comparisons